rm-validation

Validates requirements specifications through inspections, stakeholder reviews, and formal sign-off.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jcg-admin/IACT-ui --skill rm-validation-jcg-admin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rm-validation
Source: https://github.com/jcg-admin/IACT-ui/tree/main/.claude/skills/rm-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jcg-admin/IACT-ui --skill rm-validation-jcg-admin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Requirements defects discovered late in development cost 10-100x more to fix than those caught during validation. This Skill guides the formal validation step of the Requirements Management cycle, ensuring specifications are both internally correct (verification) and actually solve stakeholder needs (validation) before baseline approval. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Verification vs Validation Distinction: Separates quality-standard checks (IEEE 830 checklist) from stakeholder need confirmation, preventing approval of well-written but wrong requirements. - Multiple Validation Techniques: Supports informal walkthroughs, formal Fagan inspections with 6-phase protocol and defect taxonomy, prototype validation, and UAT sessions selected by project context. - Sign-off Matrix & Flow Decision: Produces a formal approval matrix per stakeholder role and a documented decision to advance to requirements management or return to analysis with specific defects. - Use Case: After completing a requirements specification baseline, run this Skill to conduct a Fagan inspection, log defects by type (Missing, Wrong, Ambiguous, Inconsistent), obtain sponsor and user sign-off, and generate the rm-validation.md report. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to validate the requirements specification in the current work package and produce a validation report with defect log and stakeholder sign-off matrix.

Frequently Asked Questions about rm-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate requirements before development starts?▼

Run a structured validation pass: verify each requirement against a quality checklist (complete, unambiguous, testable, traceable), then confirm with stakeholders that requirements solve their real needs. Finish with a formal sign-off matrix before baselining.

What is the difference between requirements verification and validation?▼

Verification asks whether the requirement meets quality standards and is well written. Validation asks whether it solves the stakeholder's actual business need. A requirement can pass verification yet fail validation, so both must be executed.

What is a Fagan inspection for requirements review?▼

A Fagan inspection is a formal six-phase review process: planning, overview, preparation, inspection meeting, rework, and follow-up. It uses defined roles (moderator, author, reviewers, scribe) and detects 70-85% of defects, roughly double an informal walkthrough.

When should I use a walkthrough instead of a formal inspection?▼

Use informal walkthroughs for small teams, internal projects, and low-regulation contexts where speed matters. Reserve formal Fagan inspections for high-criticality or regulated systems where the extra rigor and defect detection rate justify the 3-4x time cost.

What are the limitations of stakeholder sign-off on requirements?▼

Sign-off only confirms stakeholders agreed with what they read; it does not guarantee correctness. Real validation occurs when the system is in use, and UAT may reveal needs never articulated during elicitation, requiring further iteration.