What problem does it solve? Draft legal documents like acciones de tutela and derechos de petición are often rejected, declared inadmissible, or lose credibility due to unsupported facts, missing evidence, weak subsidiarity arguments, or formal defects. This Skill applies the critical perspective of an experienced Colombian constitutional judge to catch those problems before the document is delivered. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured judicial review: Builds a fact-date-actor-evidence-claim matrix, then evaluates standing, immediacy, subsidiarity, provisional measures, and formal requirements through a 43-rule checklist. - Three-way decision contract: Returns a strict JSON output with a decision of approve, correct, or block, plus corrections, blocking findings, and a plain-language message for the user. - Jurisprudence discipline: Verifies and limits case-law citations to a maximum of three verified rulings with applicable rules and material connection to the facts. - Use Case: After a voice-based triage collects a user's account of an EPS denying treatment, run this Skill on the generated tutela draft to confirm every fact has documentary support, the provisional measure is justified, and the document is safe to deliver. ## Quick Start Review this tutela draft against the confirmed facts and available evidence, then tell me whether to approve, correct, or block it before delivery.
