What problem does it solve? After reviewers produce findings on a document, someone must manually walk each finding, decide which edits to apply, and reconcile conflicting suggestions. This Skill automates that act-pass: it reads rNN-{focus}.md review files, filters findings by severity, applies concrete edits to the artifact, and surfaces contradictions instead of silently picking a winner. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Severity-filtered editing: Always applies Blockers and Majors, applies Minors with concrete suggestions, and defers Nits unless explicitly opted in via includeNits. - Contradiction handling: When two reviewers prescribe incompatible fixes for the same location, it surfaces both to the captain rather than choosing one. - Structured reporting: Prints a summary of applied, deferred, and contradicted findings with counts; never writes files, commits, or spawns subagents. - Use Case: During a validate-loop iteration, triage routes an act cluster of findings from three review files to this Skill, which groups them by document location, applies the unambiguous fixes one at a time, and reports two contradictions for the captain to resolve. ## Quick Start Apply the findings from r01-architecture.md and r02-accuracy.md to the plan document at docs/plan.md and report which edits were applied or deferred.
