revisar-peca

Reviews drafted legal documents line by line through adversarial audit of evidence and citations.

50|17|Updated Jul 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/emidio-trancoso/advocacia-aberta --skill revisar-peca-emidio-trancoso
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: revisar-peca
Source: https://github.com/emidio-trancoso/advocacia-aberta/tree/main/.agents/skills/4.1-revisar-peca
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/emidio-trancoso/advocacia-aberta --skill revisar-peca-emidio-trancoso

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Drafted legal briefs often contain factual claims unsupported by case documents, misquoted testimony, or invented and outdated legal citations that opposing counsel can exploit. This Skill audits any drafted piece line by line against the case files and external legal sources, producing a prioritized correction report before filing. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evidence Verification: Checks every factual claim against case documents and hearing transcripts, validating literal quotes, timestamps, authorship, and context. - Legal Citation Validation: Confirms every statute, súmula, theme, and precedent against the case's legal research files and external search skills, flagging forced, superseded, or nonexistent sources. - Adversarial Argument Audit: Identifies unrebutted opposing arguments, unneutralized weaknesses, internal contradictions, and style issues, then delivers a structured review report with a prioritized correction plan. - Use Case: A lawyer finishes a contestação (answer) for a client case and asks for a review; the Skill inventories 12 document references, 4 testimony quotes, and 9 legal citations, verifies each one, and saves a revision report with a verdict and correction plan. ## Quick Start Review the drafted brief at casos/joao-silva/pecas/contestacao-v1.md against the case documents and legal research, then generate the revision report.

Frequently Asked Questions about revisar-peca

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a drafted legal brief for errors before filing?▼

Provide the path to the drafted brief in your case folder. The Skill reads it entirely, inventories every document reference, testimony quote, and legal citation, then verifies each against case files and external legal sources, delivering a prioritized revision report.

How to verify legal citations in a Brazilian court document?▼

Each citation is checked against the case's LEGISLACAO.md and JURISPRUDENCIA.md files, then validated externally using the buscar-fontes and buscar-tjpr search skills. Sources are classified as confirmed, replaceable, forced, nonexistent, or lacking direct precedent.

Can this review testimony quotes against hearing transcripts?▼

Yes. Every quoted statement is compared to the transcript for literal accuracy, correct timestamp, speaker identity, deponent quality, and preserved context. Paraphrases presented as literal quotes are flagged as serious findings.

Does the legal review work in ChatGPT Web without local tools?▼

Partially. The buscar-fontes skill works via MCP, but buscar-tjpr requires a local tool and does not run on hosted ChatGPT Web. In conversation mode, citations are validated with buscar-fontes and official links, with pending items recorded.

What are the limitations of automated legal document review?▼

The review only diagnoses and plans corrections; it does not rewrite the brief, which is handled by the redigir-peca skill. Review quality depends on available case files, and missing documents or transcripts reduce verification coverage.