What problem does it solve? Legal professionals often receive ready-made drafts (contestations, appeals, opinions, official letters) and must decide whether they are safe to sign or file. This Skill reviews an existing draft as a potential institutional act, identifying fatal defects, unnecessary commitments, missing context, and unsupported factual claims before it goes out. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Go/No-Go Verdict: Classifies each draft as 🟢 ready, 🟡 ready with closed fixes, or 🔴 unfit, with the dominant reason in one sentence. - Commitment Surface Analysis: Maps what the signature actually asserts, admits, requests, or concedes, and flags commitments broader than necessary. - Adversarial Fact Verification: Formulates questions designed to falsify the draft's material claims, with guidance on using court records, DataJud, and official sources. - Use Case: A prosecutor receives a draft appeal from staff and asks whether it can be filed. The Skill checks whether an act is even required, runs the fatal-defect checklist for procedural pieces, verifies factual anchors, and returns a verdict with only the minimal surgical edits needed. ## Quick Start Review this draft contestation and tell me whether it is safe to file, listing only the indispensable corrections.
