skills.rest
wp-media
wp-mediaOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review

Automate lead-reviewer code reviews for GitHub pull requests.

81|31|Updated Jul 12, 2016
Search Tags:#automation#github#standards#static-analysis#code-review#pull-request#lead-reviewer
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wp-media/imagify-plugin --skill review-wp-media
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/wp-media/imagify-plugin/tree/main/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wp-media/imagify-plugin --skill review-wp-media

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automatically perform comprehensive code reviews for pull requests using the lead-reviewer workflow. It streamlines validation against project standards and enables inline comments and a summarized report to GitHub if desired.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Standalone, end-to-end PR review against the project's standards and spec.
  • Outputs a detailed findings report, blockers, and nice-to-haves for review efficiency.
  • Supports posting comments and summary to GitHub based on prompts and user confirmation.

Quick Start

Run the lead-reviewer on the target PR or current branch to start the automated code review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate pull request code reviews against project standards?▼

Automated pull request code reviews are performed by resolving the target PR, loading project configuration, locating any linked spec, and invoking a lead-reviewer agent to validate code against project standards.

Can I post inline comments and a summary report directly to GitHub?▼

Yes, you can post inline review comments and a summarized report directly to GitHub. The process generates a standalone review report with blockers and nice-to-haves, prompting for user confirmation before posting.

How does static analysis integrate with lead-reviewer PR workflows?▼

Static analysis integrates with lead-reviewer PR workflows by applying project-standard checks across specified branches and pull requests, returning a detailed findings report for review efficiency.

Does the automated code review process require linked specifications?▼

The automated code review process locates any linked spec to validate against project standards, but it operates end-to-end even if a spec is not found, outputting a standalone review report.

What is the best way to review code on a current branch without manual checks?▼

The best way to review code on a current branch without manual checks is to run the lead-reviewer agent on the target branch, which loads project config and returns a comprehensive review report.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
getty104getty104
11

resolve-pr-comments

Resolve unresolved GitHub pull request review threads via the GraphQL API.

Community
Intermediate
man-groupman-group
2.5k

review-pr

Review ArcticDB pull requests and post deduplicated inline comments.

Official
Advanced
AAbdulghanyAAbdulghany

code-review

Automate pull request reviews with role-based gating and human sign-off.

Community
Advanced
tmchowtmchow
60

clawpatch

Automate code reviews and apply fixes via the Clawpatch CLI.

Community
Advanced