review

Guide structured beta reviews through phases with evidence-backed verdicts.

8|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill review-usurobor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/usurobor/cnos/tree/main/src/packages/cnos.cdd/skills/cdd/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill review-usurobor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Orchestrates a multi-phase, evidence-backed review process that ensures contracts, diffs, and architectures are coherent before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-driven review lifecycle: contract integrity, issue contract walk, diff-context, and architecture checks.
  • Evidence-based verdicts: every claim traces to artifacts with CI gate verification.
  • Governance and consistency: enforces gamma-scaffold completeness and structured rollback paths. Use cases include teams performing rigorous, auditable PR reviews and multi-phase QA for critical changes.

Quick Start

Start a beta review against the target branch to trigger Phase 1 contract integrity, Phase 2 issue contract walk, and Phase 2 diff/architecture checks.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run evidence-backed code reviews for critical pull requests?▼

Evidence-backed code reviews require a multi-phase process guiding reviewers through contract integrity, diff-context, and architecture checks. Every claim traces to artifacts, enforcing scaffolding completeness before producing a verifiable verdict with CI gate checks.

What is a multi-phase review process for ensuring contract integrity before merging?▼

A multi-phase review process orchestrates contract integrity checks, issue contract walks, and diff-context architecture checks sequentially. It ensures architectural coherence before merging by tracing every claim to artifacts and enforcing gamma-scaffold requirements before approval.

How do I trace review claims to artifacts for CI gate verification?▼

Trace review claims to artifacts by running a structured beta review that enforces evidence-backed verdicts through Phase 1, Phase 2a, 2b, and 2c. This produces a verifiable verdict with CI gate checks before final approval.

Can I enforce gamma-scaffold completeness during a PR review?▼

Yes, you can enforce gamma-scaffold completeness during a PR review by triggering a structured beta review. The process mandates gamma-scaffold requirements and structured rollback paths before granting final approval.

Does this structured review process work for multi-phase QA on critical changes?▼

This structured review process is designed for teams performing rigorous, auditable PR reviews and multi-phase QA for critical changes. It orchestrates contract integrity, diff-context, and architecture checks to ensure coherence before merging.

What are the limitations of automated architecture checks in code review?▼

Automated architecture checks in code review are limited to verifying coherence against existing contracts and diff-context. They require gamma-scaffold completeness and structured rollback paths to be established before producing a verifiable verdict.