review-tracker

Merge review files into a consolidated status document with deduplicated findings.

4|1|Updated Jan 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hisazumi/paper-review-skills --skill review-tracker
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-tracker
Source: https://github.com/hisazumi/paper-review-skills/tree/main/skills/review-tracker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hisazumi/paper-review-skills --skill review-tracker

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill consolidates multiple rounds of feedback across reviewers and parts into a single, actionable checklist, eliminating duplicates and enabling tracking of what has been addressed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Merge multiple review results into one document to provide a unified view.
  • Deduplicate overlapping issues reported by different reviewers, preserving the most precise wording.
  • Track the status across drafts and reviews (thesis, code, design) and generate a prioritized task list.

Quick Start

Use the review-tracker to merge multiple review files into a single tracking document. For example:

  • /review-tracker feedback1.md feedback2.md --source manuscript.tex --output review_tracking.md

Frequently Asked Questions about review-tracker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I consolidate feedback from multiple reviewers into a single checklist?▼

To consolidate feedback from multiple reviewers, ingest multiple review files to identify duplicate findings, assign categories and priorities, and output a single consolidated tracking document.

How do I deduplicate overlapping code review findings across different files?▼

Deduplicating overlapping code review findings involves ingesting multiple review files, identifying duplicate issues, preserving the most precise wording, and generating a prioritized task list.

Can I track thesis review status across multiple drafts and reviewers?▼

Yes, you can track thesis review status by merging multiple rounds of feedback into a unified document, eliminating duplicates, and tracking what has been addressed across drafts.

What is the best way to merge multiple review files into a prioritized task list?▼

The best way to merge review files is to ingest feedback documents, detect and remove duplicate findings, categorize and assign priorities to the remaining issues, and output a consolidated status document.

Does this feedback consolidation approach work for both code reviews and design reviews?▼

Yes, this feedback consolidation approach works for code reviews, design reviews, and theses where feedback is distributed across files or sections and requires deduplication to reveal priority tasks.

Why do I need to remove duplicates when tracking feedback across multiple reviewers?▼

Removing duplicates when tracking feedback is necessary because multiple reviewers often report overlapping issues, and deduplication preserves the most precise wording to reveal a clean, prioritized task list.