review-tech-checklist

Evaluate code and design quality across security, type-safety, error handling, performance, and style.

1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi --skill review-tech-checklist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-tech-checklist
Source: https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi/tree/main/review-tech-checklist
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/froide-kk/michinushi --skill review-tech-checklist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, repeatable framework for technical code reviews, ensuring critical quality gates are consistently applied across security, typing, error handling, performance, and architectural consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security checks: verify authentication, authorization, data handling, and protection against common threats.
  • Type-safety and error handling: ensure explicit null handling and safe type usage.
  • Performance and quality: identify potential bottlenecks and enforce coding best practices.
  • Consistency with existing patterns: align with project conventions and ADR-style documentation.
  • Use Case: apply during code review cycles to produce a standardized checklist-driven report.

Quick Start

Run the reviewer agent on your codebase to perform the full set of checks and generate a findings report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-tech-checklist

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a systematic technical code review checklist?▼

A technical code review checklist provides a structured, repeatable framework to evaluate code quality. It organizes criteria for security, type-safety, error handling, performance, and consistency into bite-sized auditable checkpoints.

How do I perform a security and type-safety code review?▼

To perform security and type-safety code reviews, apply a structured checklist verifying authentication, authorization, data handling, and explicit null handling. This generates a standardized findings report identifying potential bottlenecks and threats.

Can I use a code review checklist to enforce project consistency and ADR patterns?▼

Yes, you can use this code review checklist to enforce project consistency by aligning code with existing conventions and ADR-style documentation. It evaluates architectural consistency alongside performance and coding best practices.

What's the best way to standardize error handling and performance checks across software projects?▼

The best way to standardize error handling and performance checks is applying a repeatable quality gate framework. This ensures explicit safe type usage and bottleneck identification are consistently evaluated across software projects during review cycles.

Does a structured code review checklist work for generating auditable findings reports?▼

Yes, a structured code review checklist works for generating auditable findings reports. It satisfies requirements for repeatable guidance by organizing categories and criteria into bite-sized items, producing a standardized checklist-driven report.