review-pr

Review pull requests for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

1|Updated Mar 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sitharaj88/claude-skills --skill review-pr-sitharaj88
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/sitharaj88/claude-skills/tree/main/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sitharaj88/claude-skills --skill review-pr-sitharaj88

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gh, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing pull requests, ensuring code quality, security, and maintainability by systematically analyzing changes and providing structured feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Code Analysis: Evaluates code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues.
  • Severity-Based Feedback: Categorizes findings into Critical, Warnings, Suggestions, and Nitpicks for clear prioritization.
  • Use Case: When you need a thorough, objective assessment of a pull request before merging, this Skill provides detailed feedback, saving valuable developer time and improving overall code quality.

Quick Start

Use the review-pr skill to analyze pull request number 123.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a GitHub pull request code review for security and performance?▼

To automate a GitHub pull request code review, fetch the PR diff, changed files, and comments to evaluate correctness, security vulnerabilities, and performance bottlenecks. The analysis categorizes findings by severity to produce structured, prioritized feedback before merging.

How do I review a pull request on GitHub using the command line?▼

Reviewing a pull request on GitHub via command line involves passing a specific PR number or URL to the analysis tool. It fetches the PR diff and categorizes findings into Critical, Warnings, Suggestions, and Nitpicks for clear prioritization.

Does automated code review work with the gh CLI?▼

Yes, automated code review operates using the GitHub CLI. You provide a PR number or URL as an argument, and the tool fetches the necessary diff and changed files to systematically analyze code maintainability and security.

What is the best way to categorize code review findings by severity?▼

The best way to categorize code review findings by severity is to group issues into Critical, Warnings, Suggestions, and Nitpicks. This structured feedback approach ensures clear prioritization of security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks.

Do I need a PR number to analyze a pull request for maintainability issues?▼

Yes, you need to provide a specific PR number or URL as an argument to analyze a pull request. This identifier allows the tool to fetch the exact PR diff, changed files, and comments needed for the maintainability assessment.

Why categorize pull request feedback into Critical, Warnings, and Nitpicks?▼

Categorizing pull request feedback into Critical, Warnings, Suggestions, and Nitpicks provides structured review feedback with clear prioritization. This severity-based approach helps developers address security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks before merging.