review-pr

Review pull request diffs against repository canon and security policies.

1|Updated Jul 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent --skill review-pr-houfu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-pr
Source: https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent/tree/main/skills/review-pr
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/houfu/lq-maintainer-agent --skill review-pr-houfu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the challenge of maintaining high-quality code standards in large repositories by providing a tiered, automated review process that ensures every contribution is treated with respect and rigor.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered Review Logic: Automatically routes PRs to either a Tier-1 quick pass for small fixes or a Tier-2 deep dive for complex changes.
  • Evidence-Based Reporting: Generates a contributor-friendly reading deck and internal evidence record, ensuring all feedback is grounded in the repository's canon.
  • Use Case: A maintainer can use this to process a complex PR by invoking the review skill, which will then perform a multi-pass analysis, check against security triggers, and draft a professional, actionable response for the contributor.

Quick Start

Run the review-pr skill by providing the pull request number to initiate a tiered analysis of the changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-pr

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests?▼

Automated code review for pull requests is achieved by performing tiered, evidence-based analysis against repository canon and security policies. The process applies read-only analysis to generate structured, actionable feedback for software maintenance workflows.

How does tiered code review work for GitHub pull requests?▼

Tiered code review automatically routes pull requests to either a Tier-1 quick pass for small fixes or a Tier-2 deep dive for complex changes. This mechanism ensures appropriate analysis depth based on the diff's characteristics.

What is the best way to perform security vetting on external contributions?▼

Security vetting for external contributions is best performed through multi-pass analysis that checks diffs against defined security triggers. This approach generates an internal evidence record ensuring all feedback is grounded in repository canon.

Can I use automated triage for software maintenance on complex pull requests?▼

Yes, automated triage for software maintenance supports complex pull requests by invoking a multi-pass analysis. It checks against security policies and drafts a professional, actionable response for the contributor.

Does automated pull request review modify the repository?▼

Automated pull request review satisfies requirements for non-destructive, read-only analysis. It does not modify the repository, ensuring safe triage and quality assurance for external contributions.

How to generate actionable feedback for contributors from a pull request diff?▼

Actionable feedback is generated by analyzing the pull request diff against repository canon to create a contributor-friendly reading deck. This evidence-based reporting ensures all feedback is structured and grounded.