What problem does it solve? Manual pull request review is inconsistent: reviewers miss re-review context, post comments on invalid diff lines, duplicate prior findings, and skip formal verdicts. This Skill enforces a structured GitHub PR review workflow that detects re-reviews, calibrates strictness, and posts findings correctly via the GitHub API. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Re-review detection: Fetches prior reviews, commits, and comment threads to categorize findings as addressed, still open, or new — avoiding duplicate comments. - Strictness modes: Recommends Quick, Standard, Thorough, or Strict mode based on PR size and security sensitivity (auth, RBAC, CI/CD changes), confirmed with the user before analysis. - Inline comments plus formal verdict: Posts each finding as a separate 🔴/🟡/🟢 inline comment verified against diff hunks, then submits a separate APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES review with linked findings. - Batch and large-PR support: Reviews multiple PRs in parallel with subagents and falls back to paginated file APIs when diffs exceed GitHub's size limits. - Use Case: Run /review-pr https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123 to get a deep analysis with inline blocker comments and a formal REQUEST_CHANGES verdict, or re-review a PR after fixes to confirm prior blockers are resolved. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review a GitHub pull request by providing its URL or number, for example: review PR https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123 and post inline comments with a formal verdict.