skills.rest
choi-jaehyun
choi-jaehyunCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review-paper

Critique methodology, writing, and citations in .tex, .pdf, or .qmd manuscripts.

Updated Feb 21, 2026
Search Tags:#writing#review#citation#manuscript#econometrics#referee#domain-reviewer
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/choi-jaehyun/jaehyun-claude-workflow --skill review-paper-choi-jaehyun
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-paper
Source: https://github.com/choi-jaehyun/jaehyun-claude-workflow/tree/main/.agents/skills/review-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/choi-jaehyun/jaehyun-claude-workflow --skill review-paper-choi-jaehyun

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables researchers to obtain a rigorous, referee-style evaluation of a manuscript by combining methodological critique with writing quality assessment, streamlining the feedback process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured five-lens critique following the domain-reviewer approach.
  • Generates both a substance review and a final synthesis-style paper review for submission readiness.
  • Works with manuscripts in .tex, .pdf, or .qmd formats and reads from standard project directories to locate the manuscript.

Quick Start

Provide the path to the manuscript to generate a detailed referee-style review and save both the substance review and the final synthesis review to quality_reports.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a referee-style review for my academic manuscript?▼

To get a referee-style review, provide the path to your academic manuscript. The skill identifies and critiques methodological, writing, and citation aspects to produce a comprehensive referee-style review.

Can I review manuscripts in LaTeX, PDF, or Quarto formats?▼

Yes, you can review manuscripts in .tex, .pdf, or .qmd formats. The skill reads from standard project directories to locate your manuscript and apply its critique protocol.

What is the domain-reviewer five-lens protocol for manuscript evaluation?▼

The five-lens protocol is a structured critique approach that evaluates the substantive and writing aspects of an academic manuscript. It informs the methodological, writing, and citation critiques to ensure a rigorous evaluation.

How do I generate a substance review and a final paper review?▼

You generate both reviews by providing the manuscript path. The skill saves a substance review to quality_reports/[filename]_substance_review.md and a combined synthesis review to quality_reports/paper_review_[name].md.

Does this tool critique econometrics and citation practices in academic papers?▼

Yes, the tool critiques econometrics and citation practices alongside writing quality. It applies a five-lens protocol to identify methodological flaws and citation issues for a top-tier referee-style evaluation.

What are the limitations of using automated referee-style manuscript reviews?▼

While the skill provides a rigorous five-lens critique, it is limited to processing .tex, .pdf, or .qmd files. It cannot replace human peer review judgment for highly novel or unconventional research methodologies.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
fredmilhomefredmilhome

review-paper

Automate academic manuscript review with single-pass, adversarial, and peer-review modes.

Community
Advanced
pedrohcgspedrohcgs
1.5k

review-paper

Review economics and social science manuscripts for argument structure, econometrics, and citations.

Community
Advanced
Unified-Field-Theory-ResearchUnified-Field-Theory-Research

gpd-respond-to-referees

Generate structured responses to referee reports for scholarly manuscripts.

Official
Advanced
fredmilhomefredmilhome

seven-pass-review

Review academic papers using a seven-lens adversarial approach with prioritized revision suggestions.

Community
Advanced