What problem does it solve? Stale or inaccurate documentation misleads users more than missing docs. This Skill adversarially reviews READMEs, guides, and references by checking every claim against the actual code and running every documented example before approval. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Accuracy verification: Cross-checks signatures, parameters, flags, config keys, defaults, and version numbers against the current codebase, flagging drift as blocking. - Example execution: Runs every documented command and snippet (or confirms CI runs them) to reject illustrative-but-untested examples. - Fit and completeness checks: Validates Diataxis mode purity, audience fit, completeness, scannability, and drift guards like broken links and stale screenshots. - Use Case: After a code change that touched user-facing docs, run this review to severity-tag findings ([blocker]/[major]/[minor]/[nit]) and emit a structured review-result evidence profile. ## Quick Start Review the README and docs in this repository against the current code and report any inaccuracies with severity tags.
