review-design

Review design documents with 29 checks across phases 0–7.

5|1|Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tonitangpotato/rustclaw --skill review-design-tonitangpotato
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-design
Source: https://github.com/tonitangpotato/rustclaw/tree/main/skills/review-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tonitangpotato/rustclaw --skill review-design-tonitangpotato

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill performs a one-pass, systematic review of design documents to surface bugs and inconsistencies before implementation, ensuring a robust and verifiable design baseline.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 29-check review workflow across phases 0–7 that validates structure, logic, error handling, and implementability.
  • Structural completeness & traceability: ensures every referenced type and section exists, is used, and is consistently named.
  • Actionable findings: outputs concrete issues with recommended fixes and a traceable audit trail for stakeholders.
  • Sub-agent collaboration: supports spawning iterations and sub-agents for large design reviews when needed.

Quick Start

Provide a complete design review of the target DESIGN.md using the standard 29-check protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a design document to catch bugs before implementation?▼

Design doc review is a systematic one-pass evaluation that checks structure, logic, error handling, and implementability to surface bugs before implementation. It validates that referenced types exist and are consistently named, ensuring a robust design baseline.

What is the best way to ensure my DESIGN.md is structurally complete and traceable?▼

The best way to ensure structural completeness is a 29-check review protocol across phases 0–7. This validates that every referenced type and section exists, is used, and is consistently named, producing an actionable audit trail for stakeholders.

Can I use a static check workflow to validate new and updated design docs?▼

Yes, you can use a static check workflow to validate both new and updated design documents like DESIGN.md or DESIGN-*.md. The review applies 29 checks across phases 0–7 to verify logic, risk, and implementability, outputting concrete issues with suggested fixes.

How do I handle design reviews for large design documents with complex logic?▼

To handle large design documents, the review workflow supports spawning iterations and sub-agents for large design reviews when needed. This allows the 29-check protocol to thoroughly process complex logic and structure while maintaining a traceable audit trail.

Does design review output include suggested fixes for quality assurance?▼

Yes, design review output includes concrete findings with recommended fixes for quality assurance. It records results for audit purposes, providing stakeholders with a traceable audit trail of all structural, logic, and implementability issues found during the 29-check review.