skills.rest
dbc-oduffy
dbc-oduffyCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Route plan-design-RFC pre-flight checks and triage reviewer findings into integration or PM escalation.

5|2|Updated Mar 20, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#acceptance criteria#rfc#triage#plan review#prior-art checking#pm em collaboration
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude --skill review-dbc-oduffy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/tree/main/plugins/coordinator/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude --skill review-dbc-oduffy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill turns completed plan/design/RFC work into a structured review-to-integration workflow, so PMs can make clear scope/ship decisions while EMs and reviewers apply consistent technical and evidence checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Outgoing plan pre-flight checks: Runs prior-art and external-API citation checks (plus lightweight acceptance-criteria shape and internal completeness offers) before the main reviewer reads the plan.
  • Reviewer routing and sequencing: Selects domain and/or generalist reviewers via routing fragments and enforces sequential integration (no parallelization for plan reviews).
  • Incoming findings triage: Applies a strict disposition table for findings, integrating tradeoff-free corrections automatically while escalating scope/architectural decisions to the PM.

Quick Start

Use coordinator:review when an EM has a plan/RFC ready for review or when review findings have landed on a plan and need to be processed into PM decisions and integrations.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I route plan review findings into PM decisions and integrations?▼

Plan review findings are routed using a strict triage policy that automatically integrates tradeoff-free corrections while escalating scope and build-vs-defer decisions to the PM.

What are plan pre-flight checks and how do they work for RFC reviews?▼

Pre-flight checks run prior-art and external-API citation validation, plus lightweight acceptance-criteria shape checks, before the main reviewer reads the RFC or plan to ensure readiness.

Can I run parallel pre-flight checks and parallel reviewer integration for plan reviews?▼

You can run parallel pre-flight checks where specified, but reviewer integration is strictly sequential and deterministic, meaning no parallelization is allowed for plan reviews.

How are reviewers selected for architectural plan and RFC reviews?▼

Reviewers are selected via routing-table based fragments that assign domain or generalist reviewers, enforcing deterministic sequencing to process architectural review findings.

Does this handle evidence-driven disagreements and tradeoff signals in RFC reviews?▼

RFC reviews apply a strict disposition table that processes evidence-driven disagreements and tradeoff signals, integrating corrections while escalating architectural decisions.

When do I need prior-art checking and acceptance-criteria readiness for product reviews?▼

Prior-art checking and acceptance-criteria readiness are needed when a completed plan or RFC enters the review-to-integration workflow to ensure PMs can make clear scope decisions.

Related Skills

Explore More Product & Management Skills→
dailydmdailydm

implement

Translate breakdown tasks into implementation plans and code changes.

Community
Advanced
first-flukefirst-fluke
218

free-tool-strategy

Plan and evaluate free marketing tools for lead generation and SEO.

Official
Basic
catlog22catlog22
76

maestro-knowledge

Route natural-language requests to Maestro knowledge lifecycle commands.

Community
Advanced
canpok1canpok1

github

Automate GitHub issues, pull requests, and review threads via gh CLI.

Community
Advanced