review-content-quality

Evaluate generated images and videos against briefs and propose minimal evidence-based repairs.

154|27|Updated Aug 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/openvetta/open-vetta --skill review-content-quality-openvetta
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-content-quality
Source: https://github.com/openvetta/open-vetta/tree/main/packages/plugins/presets/content-creation/agent/skills/review-content-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/openvetta/open-vetta --skill review-content-quality-openvetta

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? AI-generated images and videos often look plausible at a glance but fail against the creative brief, brand constraints, or continuity requirements. This Skill provides a structured review method that judges the actual rendered artifact, applies must-pass quality gates, and proposes the smallest targeted repair instead of blind regeneration. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Rubric-based evaluation: Score images and videos across dimensions like brief fidelity, composition, motion coherence, and technical finish, with must-pass gates that block approval regardless of total score. - Scenario-specific gates: Apply tailored checks for logos, ecommerce product sets, identity/try-on work, UI designs, UGC, product films, and long-form clipping. - Evidence-based repair policy: Map failures to a causal layer (brief, reference, structure, capability, or stochastic) and change one variable per iteration while preserving what already works. - Use Case: After generating five product video variants, use this Skill to rank them against the brief, identify a temporal artifact in the best candidate, and get a single targeted regeneration instruction. ## Quick Start Use the review-content-quality skill to evaluate this generated product video against its brief and tell me the smallest fix needed.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-content-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review AI-generated images for quality before publishing?▼

Review AI-generated images by first applying must-pass gates for missing subjects, wrong ratios, identity violations, and severe artifacts, then scoring dimensions like brief fidelity, composition, and technical finish from 1-5 with visible evidence. A failed gate blocks approval regardless of total score.

How to evaluate AI-generated video quality?▼

Evaluate AI-generated video by sampling the opening state, first motion, middle, critical transitions, final state, and audio alignment rather than judging a single frame. Check must-pass gates for temporal failures like popping, deformation, or incoherent transitions, then score motion coherence, camera control, and continuity.

What should I check when reviewing AI-generated product photos for ecommerce?▼

Check that product geometry, color, material, labels, and scale match the authoritative reference, that each asset serves an assigned listing job, and that no invented features, badges, or reviews appear. Contact shadows, reflections, and use physics must also be plausible.

When should I regenerate an AI image versus repair the prompt?▼

Map the failure to its causal layer first: brief failures need prompt repair, reference failures need better input selection, capability failures need a different model or mode, and stochastic failures justify one retry of the same setup. After two comparable failures, change the causal layer instead of repeating.

What are the limitations of automated visual quality review?▼

If the actual pixels or frames are unavailable, visual quality cannot be verified and conclusions are limited to workflow and runtime evidence. The method also cannot override hard capability limits; when no model supports a requirement, it reports the limitation and suggests a reduced requirement or external production step.