review-commit

Automate code change review for quality, security, and best practices before pull requests.

4|Updated Jan 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools --skill review-commit-signalcompose
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-commit
Source: https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools/tree/main/plugins/code/skills/review-commit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools --skill review-commit-signalcompose

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code changes for quality, security, and best practices before a Pull Request is created, ensuring higher code standards and reducing manual review overhead.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Analysis: Analyzes working directory changes for critical, important, and minor issues.
  • Iterative Fixing: Employs a dedicated 'Fixer' agent to address critical and important issues.
  • Quality Gates: Ensures code meets predefined quality standards before approval.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a feature branch for review, run this Skill to automatically catch potential security vulnerabilities and bugs, and have them fixed by an agent.

Quick Start

Run a code review on the current working directory changes to prepare for a pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-commit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review and quality checks before creating a pull request?▼

Automate code review by running an agent that analyzes working directory changes for critical, important, and minor issues, uses a dedicated fixer agent to resolve problems, and enforces an iterative review loop before creating a pull request.

What's the best way to catch security vulnerabilities and bugs in a feature branch automatically?▼

The best way to catch security vulnerabilities and bugs is to run an automated code analysis on your working directory changes, which categorizes issues by severity and employs a fixer agent to resolve critical and important problems.

How does the iterative fixing process work for code quality gates?▼

The iterative fixing process enforces a maximum of five review loops using dedicated agents to review code changes and address critical and important issues, generating an approval flag only upon successful resolution of those issues.

Can I run an automated code review directly on my current working directory changes?▼

Yes, you can run an automated code review directly on your current working directory changes to analyze quality, security, and best practices, preparing your code for a pull request without requiring external dependencies.

Does automated code review categorize issues by severity?▼

Automated code review categorizes identified issues into critical, important, and minor severity levels, using dedicated agents to iteratively fix the critical and important problems before generating a final approval flag.

What happens if critical code quality issues are not resolved after multiple review iterations?▼

The iterative review loop runs a maximum of five times to fix critical and important issues using a dedicated fixer agent; if these issues remain unresolved, the automated code review will not generate the final approval flag.