review-biomedical

Runs a multi-agent audit of LaTeX and Typst biomedical documents for build, structural, scientific, and safety issues.

Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-biomedical
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-biomedical
Source: https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-biomedical
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-biomedical

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Large biomedical manuscripts and repositories contain many interdependent failure modes — build errors, broken references, uncited or overstated scientific claims, domain-specific inaccuracies, and patient-safety risks — and manually checking all of these across files and formats is slow, error-prone, and safety-sensitive. This Skill provides an orchestrated, repeatable audit that surfaces structural, scientific, and safety issues so authors and reviewers can prioritize fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates 20 specialized auditor passes in a deterministic sequence covering build & references, writing quality, scientific rigor, domain biology, pharmacology, safety, and publication readiness.
  • Supports LaTeX and Typst sources, resolves globs, performs keyword-gated domain audits, and aggregates per-agent findings into a single consolidated markdown report.
  • Produces resumable checkpoints to enable long reviews across limited contexts, reports skipped agents and errors, and enforces read-only audit mode so no files are modified.
  • Use case: run a full manuscript audit on contents/part2-pathophysiology/**/* to surface citation gaps, unsafe clinical recommendations, and domain-specific factual inconsistencies.

Quick Start

Run the review-biomedical skill on the target file glob (for example contents/**/*.tex) to generate an aggregate audit report and checkpoint in the runtime directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-biomedical

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a biomedical manuscript for safety and citation gaps?▼

You can audit a biomedical manuscript by running a sequential, multi-pass review over LaTeX or Typst files to detect structural, scientific, domain-specific, and safety issues. The process aggregates per-agent findings into a single consolidated markdown report.

What does a multi-agent biomedical document review check for?▼

A multi-agent biomedical document review checks for build errors, broken references, writing quality, scientific rigor, domain biology, pharmacology accuracy, and safety risks. It operates read-only across LaTeX and Typst sources to surface issues without modifying files.

Can I audit Typst and LaTeX sources for pathophysiology or immunology errors?▼

Yes, you can audit Typst and LaTeX sources for pathophysiology or immunology errors. The review applies keyword-gated domain audits to specifically target factual inaccuracies in domain-focused chapters and biomedical repositories.

What is the best way to check large biomedical repositories for publication readiness?▼

The best way to check large biomedical repositories for publication readiness is using an orchestrated, deterministic sequence of 20 specialized auditor passes. This enforces a read-only audit mode and generates resumable checkpoints to handle long reviews across limited contexts.

Does the biomedical document audit modify my source files during review?▼

No, the biomedical document audit does not modify your source files. It enforces a strict read-only audit mode to ensure no files are changed while it analyzes your LaTeX or Typst manuscripts for clinical and scientific issues.