What problem does it solve? Animation code often passes review because it technically works while feeling sluggish, firing too often, animating layout properties, or ignoring accessibility. This Skill applies a strict, opinionated review bar to motion code so feel-breaking regressions get flagged instead of merged. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Standards-based review: Measures every animation in a diff against ten non-negotiable rules covering easing, duration, transform origin, interruptibility, GPU-only properties, and accessibility. - Escalation triggers: Hard-flags known anti-patterns on sight, such as transition: all, scale(0) entrances, ease-in on UI, and animation on keyboard-triggered actions. - Structured output: Produces a Before/After/Why findings table plus a tiered verdict ending in an explicit Block or Approve decision. - Use Case: A pull request adds a dropdown that fades in over 400ms with ease-in and transform-origin: center. The review flags the sluggish easing, the over-300ms duration, and the wrong origin, citing exact fixes from STANDARDS.md. ## Quick Start Review the animation and motion code in this pull request and give me a findings table with a block or approve verdict.