What problem does it solve? Reviewing past AI coding sessions manually is slow and subjective, making it hard to spot recurring anti-patterns like bandaid fixes, skipped investigation, or debugging spirals. This Skill automates retrospective analysis of JSONL session transcripts and produces a structured, evidence-based report. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Programmatic Extraction: Python scripts parse large JSONL session files into compact JSON summaries with tool counts, signal flags, and investigation ratios, avoiding context overflow. - Rubric-Based Scoring: Scores each session across 7 weighted dimensions (session discipline, problem-solving flow, fix quality, debugging efficiency, communication, context management, tool efficiency) with cited evidence. - Structured Reporting & Proposals: Outputs a formatted report with dimension trends, per-session breakdowns, and diff-style proposals for MEMORY.md and dev-process.md updates that require explicit user approval. - Use Case: Run /retro 7d at the end of a week to review all recent sessions, identify that investigation ratios are consistently below 1.0, and receive a proposed new dev-process rule requiring hypothesis statements before edits. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run /retro 5 to analyze the last five sessions and produce a scored retrospective report with proposed memory updates.