result-evaluator

Evaluate analysis results for accuracy, reliability, and statistical rigor with structured verdicts.

64|15|Updated Aug 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery --skill result-evaluator-openjiuwen-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: result-evaluator
Source: https://github.com/openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery/tree/main/skills/result-evaluator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/openJiuwen-ai/sciencediscovery --skill result-evaluator-openjiuwen-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Analysis results produced by code or research workflows can contain hallucinated numbers, fabricated citations, weak statistical methodology, or unverifiable claims. This Skill audits those results before they are trusted downstream, deciding whether to accept them or send them back for revision. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Source Reliability Hard Gate: Detects hallucinated statistics, fake references, and code-data misalignment, triggering immediate revision when fabrication is found. - Multi-Dimensional Scoring: Scores Accuracy, Completeness, Robustness, Relevance, Methodology, and Critical Reflection on a 0-10 scale with PASS/FAIL thresholds per dimension. - Statistical Methodology Audit: Checks multiple-testing correction, model assumptions, confounder control, sample size, batch effects, missing data, and reproducibility, with domain-specific priorities for biology, chemistry, materials, and finance. - Use Case: After a code-engineer agent produces a correlation analysis with r and p-values, run this Skill to verify the numbers are reproducible from the supplied code and data, audit the statistical assumptions, and receive an ACCEPT_AND_PROCEED or REVISE_AND_RETRY verdict with prioritized revision guidance. ## Quick Start Evaluate the analysis results just produced by code-engineer and give me an ACCEPT_AND_PROCEED or REVISE_AND_RETRY decision with dimension scores and revision guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions about result-evaluator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate analysis results for quality and reliability?▼

Provide the structured results, methodology documentation, data traceability details, and analysis code. The Skill runs a 4-phase protocol covering criterion alignment, multi-dimensional scoring, statistical audit, and overall assessment, then returns a verdict with scores and revision guidance.

How to detect hallucinated numbers in AI-generated analysis results?▼

The Source Reliability hard gate checks data traceability, method consistency, fabrication, and code-data alignment. If statistics cannot be reproduced from the supplied code and data, the result is marked UNRELIABLE and immediately sent back for revision.

What statistical checks does a methodology audit cover?▼

The audit covers multiple-testing correction, model assumption verification, confounder control, sample size and power, batch effects, outlier and missing-data handling, and reproducibility. Each unmet item is recorded as a RISK with high, medium, or low severity.

Can this evaluate results from sources other than code-engineer?▼

Yes, any structured results with accompanying methodology description are accepted. The minimum required input is results data, a method description, and data source identification; missing documentation is flagged and degrades the reliability rating.

When does a result get REVISE_AND_RETRY instead of accepted?▼

Any dimension scoring below 5 triggers mandatory revision regardless of the average score. Revision also occurs when the composite rating falls to NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT, when three or more RISK items downgrade the rating, or when hallucination is detected.