researchwrite

Compose, revise, and audit evidence-grounded research proposals with a four-gate QA pipeline.

Updated Jul 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill researchwrite-huaibovip
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: researchwrite
Source: https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/nature-skills/skills/nature-proposal-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/huaibovip/research-marketplace --skill researchwrite-huaibovip

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python-docx, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Research proposals and scientific plans often suffer from unsupported claims, weak argument structure, template-like language, and scope creep. This Skill enforces an evidence-before-prose workflow that builds research canons, evidence tables, argument maps, and section contracts before drafting, then applies multi-gate quality review so proposals are defensible rather than merely fluent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three Writing Modes: compose new proposals from a topic, revise existing drafts through claim extraction and structural diagnosis, or hybrid-expand drafts while preserving approved text. - Four-Gate QA Pipeline: dynamic expert review, anti-slop language scanning, automated validation of citations and reproducibility, and 8-dimension rubric scoring with stage thresholds. - Structured Project State: foundation files (scope, canon, evidence table, argument map, section contracts, style guide) plus state.json tracking scores, rounds, and technical debts. - Use Case: A doctoral student pastes a rough research direction in Chinese; the Skill builds the evidence table and argument map, drafts sections under contracts, runs QA at the proposal tier, and exports a formatted .docx for the supervisor. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to use researchwrite to turn your research topic or existing draft into an evidence-grounded proposal, specifying the mode (compose, revise, or hybrid) and target reader.

Frequently Asked Questions about researchwrite

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a research proposal from a rough topic idea?▼

Use compose mode: provide your topic, target reader, and any existing materials. The workflow builds a research canon, evidence table, argument map, and section contracts before drafting, then scores each section against an 8-dimension rubric before export.

How to revise an existing proposal draft for weak claims?▼

Use revise mode, which extracts every claim from your text, compares it against the evidence table and canon, diagnoses structure, and produces a prioritized revision brief with P0/P1/P2 fixes. Unsupported claims are downgraded or flagged, never silently upgraded.

Does it support Chinese academic proposal writing?▼

Yes, it includes dedicated references for Chinese proposal anti-slop cleanup, Chinese review writing style, and NSFC-style constraints. The DOCX export script applies Times New Roman plus SimSun fonts with 1.5 line spacing for Chinese academic formatting.

Can it export proposals to Word documents?▼

Yes, the bundled build_proposal_docx.py script converts Markdown drafts to formatted .docx using python-docx, with 18pt centered titles, styled headings, 1-inch margins, and grid tables. Pandoc export is explicitly disallowed due to poor formatting.

What are the limitations of the proposal QA pipeline?▼

The pipeline stops after 3 revision rounds, when score improvements fall below 0.5, or when key evidence is missing. It never fabricates results or references; missing facts are marked AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED rather than hidden under fluent prose.