research-review

Conduct multi-round research reviews using external reviewer backends.

Updated Jun 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/czh-ee-2023/zotero-aris --skill research-review-czh-ee-2023
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: research-review
Source: https://github.com/czh-ee-2023/zotero-aris/tree/main/.claude/skills/research-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/czh-ee-2023/zotero-aris --skill research-review-czh-ee-2023

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply, mcp__manual_review__review, mcp__manual_review__review_reply, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive and iterative review of research work from an external reviewer backend, offering critical feedback and enhancing the quality of research output.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • External Review: Get in-depth reviews from Codex or manual reviewers, with a focus on identifying gaps, weaknesses, and suggesting improvements.
  • Multi-Round Interaction: Engage in an iterative dialogue with the reviewer to address concerns and refine your research.
  • Documentation: Document the review process and outcomes in a structured format for future reference.

Quick Start

To get a review of your research work, say: "Review my research on [topic]" or "Get an external review of my paper on [topic]".

Frequently Asked Questions about research-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get external feedback on my research paper?▼

Multi-round review handles iterative dialogue by conducting critical analysis through external reviewer backends, allowing you to address concerns and refine research ideas across multiple feedback exchanges.

Can I use iterative dialogue to address reviewer concerns on my research?▼

Iterative dialogue is supported by engaging the external reviewer across multiple rounds, allowing you to address concerns, respond to critical analysis, and refine your research ideas or experimental results.

What types of research work can I submit for a critical analysis review?▼

Critical analysis review handles various research topics, specifically tailored for enhancing the quality of research ideas, academic papers, or experimental results that require detailed context.

Does the research review process support both automated and manual reviewers?▼

The research review process supports both automated and manual reviewers, utilizing Codex and manual review backends to conduct multi-round interactions and document outcomes in a structured format.

What context do I need to provide for a detailed research review?▼

A detailed research review requires comprehensive context about your specific topic, enabling the iterative dialogue to effectively target weaknesses and suggest precise enhancements for your research output.

How is the external review process documented for future reference?▼

The external review process is documented in a structured format, capturing the multi-round interaction, critical feedback, and outcomes to ensure research enhancement details are preserved for future reference.