What problem does it solve? Research reports built on fabricated citations or unverified claims can cause real harm — bad medical decisions, flawed legal strategies, wasted investments. This Skill enforces an anti-hallucination discipline: every claim is tagged with a verification status, gaps are disclosed instead of filled, and conflicting sources are presented honestly. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured six-phase workflow: scope and decompose the question, search and gather sources, analyze perspectives, optionally run quantitative checks, compose the report, and deliver it. - Verification-tagged citations: every claim is labeled Verified, Retrieved, Training Data, or Unverifiable, with inline confidence tags for medical, legal, and financial topics. - Qualitative confidence framework: five-dimension self-assessment (source quality, consensus, recency, domain familiarity, evidence strength) plus plausibility tiers for competing perspectives. - Multiple output formats: terminal tree-style briefs, markdown files, or styled PDF reports generated via a reportlab-based script. - Use Case: Ask "is intermittent fasting actually supported by evidence?" and receive a report with competing viewpoints, plausibility tiers, cross-referenced statistics, and a citation list distinguishing verified sources from training-data recall. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to research a topic such as "do a deep dive on the evidence for intermittent fasting" and confirm the proposed research plan when prompted.