requirements_scope_lite

Convert PRDs into SMART requirements with Given/When/Then criteria.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows --skill requirements-scope-lite
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requirements_scope_lite
Source: https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows/tree/main/skills/sdlc/requirements_scope_lite
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ukrsite/kiro-workflows --skill requirements-scope-lite

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Converts raw PRDs into concise, testable functional requirements (Max 200 lines) to reduce ambiguity and accelerate validation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Converts PRDs into a compact set of SMART requirements with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria.
  • Produces a structured output consisting of Requirements Assessment, Refined Functional Requirements (table), and Risk & MoSCoW Summary.
  • Helps align stakeholders by delivering a clear, testable feature contract suitable for review and sign-off.

Quick Start

Provide a PRD and receive a compact, testable set of SMART requirements within 200 lines.

Frequently Asked Questions about requirements_scope_lite

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I convert a PRD into testable functional requirements?▼

To convert a PRD into testable functional requirements, input the raw PRD document to generate 5-8 SMART requirements structured with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria and a MoSCoW risk summary.

What are SMART functional requirements with Given/When/Then acceptance criteria?▼

SMART functional requirements are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound conditions validated using Given/When/Then acceptance criteria to ensure clear pass/fail outcomes for user workflows.

How to write acceptance criteria for product features using MoSCoW prioritization?▼

Writing acceptance criteria with MoSCoW prioritization involves generating a structured risk summary that categorizes functional requirements into Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, and Won't-have tiers.

Can I use this to refine business analysis requirements for stakeholder sign-off?▼

Yes, you can refine business analysis requirements for stakeholder sign-off by transforming raw PRDs into a compact, verifiable feature contract under 200 lines that reduces ambiguity and accelerates validation.

What is the best way to structure functional requirements analysis from a raw PRD?▼

The best way to structure functional requirements analysis is producing a three-part output: a requirements assessment, a refined functional requirements table, and a risk summary with explicit constraints.

Does this requirements analysis approach work for complex user workflows with many constraints?▼

Yes, this requirements analysis approach works for complex user workflows by applying SMART criteria to extract 5-8 verifiable requirements while explicitly documenting known risks and constraints in a MoSCoW summary.