requirement-review

Review requirement documents and generate structured Go/No-Go decision artifacts.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill requirement-review-taptap
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requirement-review
Source: https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins/tree/main/plugins/test/skills/requirement-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/taptap/agents-plugins --skill requirement-review-taptap

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This workflow performs a systematic quality check of requirement documents before review meetings, identifying logic gaps, missing constraints, cross-team dependencies, and items requiring explicit confirmation so teams can make clear Go/No-Go decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured 5‑stage pipeline: init → fetch → understand → review → output to ensure repeatable, auditable reviews.
  • 12‑dimension checklist and templates: enforces coverage across functionality, state flows, data constraints, security, UX, testing, and impact scope.
  • Conditional multi‑agent parallel analysis: automatically runs three perspective agents for complex requirements and performs cross-validation of findings.
  • Artifacts and export: writes requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and report.md and supports Feishu export and optional Figma/GitLab lookups.

Quick Start

Provide a Feishu Story link or requirement document link to generate requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and a concise report ready for the review meeting.

Frequently Asked Questions about requirement-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review requirement documents for a Go/No-Go decision meeting?▼

To review requirement documents for a Go/No-Go decision, apply a structured checklist covering functionality, state flows, and data constraints to identify logic gaps. This generates a review report and checklist to ensure teams can make clear decisions.

Can I use Feishu links for pre-meeting requirement review and preparation?▼

Yes, you can use Feishu links for requirement review by providing a Feishu Story link or wiki/docx document. The system fetches the content to generate understanding files, checklists, and a concise report ready for the meeting.

What does a 12-dimension requirement checklist cover for pre-review preparation?▼

A 12-dimension requirement checklist covers functionality, state flows, data constraints, security, UX, testing, and impact scope. It enforces comprehensive coverage to identify cross-team dependencies and missing constraints before the review.

How do I identify cross-team dependencies and logic gaps in requirement documents?▼

To identify cross-team dependencies and logic gaps, run a systematic quality check with multi-agent parallel analysis. This cross-validation detects missing constraints and items requiring explicit confirmation across complex requirements.

Does the requirement review process support Figma and code references?▼

Yes, the requirement review process supports optional Figma and code references. Providing these design links and code references helps perform deeper pre-review analysis and meeting preparation.

What artifacts are generated after a systematic requirement quality check?▼

After a systematic requirement quality check, the artifacts generated are requirement_understanding.md, review_checklist.md, and report.md. These structured files support multi-stage review flows and can be exported to Feishu.