requirement-quality

Feature specification validation checks problem statement clarity, scenario independence, and Given/When/Then acceptance criteria formatting to ensure requirements are complete and testable. It audits epics and features to guarantee coherent user value and scope boundaries.

A well-formed feature spec requires clear problem statements, complete scope boundaries, enforced epic/feature/scenario conventions, proper frontmatter, and Given/When/Then acceptance criteria. It must demonstrate scenario independence and coherent user value to pass quality validation.

Auditing existing requirements evaluates problem statements, scenarios, and acceptance criteria for independence and complete scope. It applies standard structure validation across epics and features, producing a validation status and actionable guidelines to fix any coherence or testability gaps.

Yes, requirement validation enforces the Given/When/Then acceptance criteria format by default. It checks that scenarios follow standard BDD conventions, ensuring every feature specification produces a clear validation status and actionable guidelines for unstructured or incomplete acceptance criteria.

Automated checks evaluate feature specs to ensure scenario independence and complete scope boundaries. By applying default epic/feature/scenario conventions and frontmatter requirements, the validation process confirms coherent user value and outputs actionable guidelines for any failing specifications.

Automated specification quality checks are limited to enforcing structural conventions, frontmatter requirements, and Given/When/Then acceptance criteria formatting. They validate problem statement clarity and scenario independence but cannot assess subjective business logic or replace human review of feature scope.