requirement-consistency-check

Requirement consistency is validated by comparing target documents against reference materials to detect scope creep, coverage gaps, and semantic mismatches across three consistency dimensions.

The code-reading strategy identifies business-scene ownership by analyzing package structure and class-level commentary, intentionally bypassing method body inspection to focus on architectural boundaries.

Scope creep detection is performed as one of three consistency dimensions, comparing target design documents against reference specifications to flag out-of-bounds additions and coverage gaps.

Consistency issues are categorized using a severity-based taxonomy that assigns blocking, warning, and info annotations to guide the prioritization and remediation of detected mismatches.

Yes, requirement coverage is validated by analyzing package structures and class-level commentary, ensuring boundary alignment without requiring deep inspection of method implementations.

Boundary consistency checks rely on package structure and class commentary rather than method bodies, meaning deep logic mismatches inside methods may not be detected during semantic alignment.