requesting-staff-session

Coordinate multi-perspective staff planning sessions with tier selection and Plan vs Review modes.

5|2|Updated Mar 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill requesting-staff-session
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: requesting-staff-session
Source: https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude/tree/main/plugins/coordinator/skills/requesting-staff-session
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/oduffy-delphi/coordinator-claude --skill requesting-staff-session

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinating work that benefits from multiple viewpoints can lead to fragmented decisions and slowdowns. This skill provides a structured way to assemble, guide, and synthesize input from a diverse staff to produce a cohesive plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered engagement: Lightweight, Standard, and Full staff sessions to fit the decision context.
  • Plan mode vs Review mode: Explicitly switch between planning a solution and critiquing an existing plan.
  • Scoping guidance: A checklist to align objectives, context, and constraints before starting.

Quick Start

Invoke /staff-session with a chosen mode and tier to begin a multi-perspective planning session.

Frequently Asked Questions about requesting-staff-session

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate a multi-perspective staff planning session for a cross-domain project?▼

A staff planning session synthesizes diverse architectural and product viewpoints into a cohesive plan. It uses a scoping checklist to align objectives before guiding tier-selected debate across the team.

What's the best way to scope objectives before starting a team planning debate?▼

Scoping objectives before a team planning debate requires a checklist that aligns project context and constraints. This skill provides that checklist to ensure all staff members share an understanding before discussion begins.

Can I use a lightweight tier for routine planning sessions instead of a full staff debate?▼

Lightweight, Standard, and Full tiers are available to fit your decision context. You can use a lightweight tier for routine planning to limit team composition and debate scope while still producing a consensus-driven outcome.

How do I run a staff session to critique an existing plan instead of creating a new one?▼

To critique an existing plan, you switch the staff session into Review mode. This mode explicitly guides the diverse staff to evaluate and critique the current plan rather than generating a new solution from scratch.

When should I assemble a full staff session versus a lightweight engagement for project scoping?▼

Full staff sessions are appropriate for complex architecture or cross-domain projects needing deep consensus. Lightweight engagement suits simpler decisions where fragmented viewpoints are less likely to slow down the planning process.