reporting-guideline-compliance-checker

Provide your manuscript draft or key sections such as Methods and Results, and the review identifies the appropriate guideline, then checks core items like participant flow, eligibility criteria, and outcome definitions. Each item is marked present, weakly reported, missing, or not applicable.

CONSORT applies to randomized trials, STROBE to observational studies, PRISMA to systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and TRIPOD to prediction model development or validation. Hybrid studies may require elements from multiple frameworks, which the review flags explicitly.

Yes, hybrid studies such as observational analyses with prediction model components are handled by acknowledging mixed reporting expectations. The review avoids forcing a single-guideline label and explains how each framework's requirements apply.

At minimum, the study type and relevant manuscript sections such as the abstract, Methods, and Results. A flowchart, checklist draft, or reviewer comments improve accuracy, and the review will ask for missing material rather than guess.

The review cannot verify compliance for information absent from the provided material, and it does not fabricate participant flow, validation details, or registration data. It distinguishes reporting completeness from scientific adequacy and flags uncertainty when source material is incomplete.