repo-review-tests

Identify test-coverage gaps and validation weaknesses in a repository slice.

4|1|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill repo-review-tests
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: repo-review-tests
Source: https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language/tree/main/adl/tools/skills/repo-review-tests
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill repo-review-tests

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Reviews of complex multi-agent code bases often miss coverage gaps, weak assertions, brittle fixtures, and validation gaps that permit risky behavior to slip through. This skill provides a bounded, specialist perspective to surface these issues without editing target tests, enabling teams to strengthen test quality and governance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify coverage gaps, weak assertions, brittle fixtures, and validation gaps in a repository's test suite.
  • Produce structured findings with recommended remediations and a missing-proof map for traceability.
  • Integrate with the repo-review workflow to hand off to synthesis or remediation roles while preserving non-destructive analysis.

Quick Start

Provide a bounded test-review pass for the specified repository slice and emit a structured findings packet.

Frequently Asked Questions about repo-review-tests

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify test coverage gaps and weak assertions in a repository?▼

To identify test coverage gaps, you can use a bounded test-review specialist that scans a repository slice and surfaces missing proofs, weak assertions, and brittle fixtures. It produces structured findings without editing the target tests.

What is a missing-proof map for test validation?▼

A missing-proof map is a structured artifact that traces validation weaknesses and coverage gaps found during a test review. It maps identified risks to missing test proofs, enabling teams to track remediation for brittle fixtures and weak assertions.

How do I review test risks in a multi-agent codebase without modifying tests?▼

You can review test risks non-destructively by applying a bounded test-review specialist to a concrete repo slice. It analyzes validation gaps and emits a findings packet with residual risk notes while preserving the original target tests.

Does test coverage review work on specific branches and diffs?▼

Yes, test coverage review works on specific branches and diffs. You apply the review to a concrete repository slice such as repo_root, target, branch, diff, or review_packet to surface validation weaknesses and missing proofs for that scope.

What is the best way to surface validation weaknesses in a test suite?▼

The best way to surface validation weaknesses is to run a specialist test review that checks for coverage gaps and brittle fixtures. This generates a structured findings packet with a missing-proof map and residual risk assessment for governance.

What should be included in a test review findings packet?▼

A test review findings packet should include structured findings, a missing-proof map, validation performed, and residual risk. This suite contract ensures traceability and enables handoff to synthesis or remediation roles for fixing test coverage gaps.