What problem does it solve? After the INSS files its defense (contestacao) in a Brazilian social security lawsuit, the plaintiff's lawyer must produce a structured reply (replica) that refutes every preliminary objection and merit argument while preserving the original claims. This Skill generates that reply with the correct procedural structure, eliminating the risk of missing uncontested facts under art. 341 CPC or leaving defense arguments unanswered. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Point-by-Point Refutation: Addresses each preliminary objection (inadequate venue, decadence, res judicata, lis pendens, standing) and each merit argument raised by the federal prosecution. - Uncontested Facts Leverage: Lists facts not specifically contested by the INSS so they become incontrovertible under art. 341 CPC. - Distinguishing of Precedents: Neutralizes sumulas and jurisprudence cited by the defense through factual and temporal distinguishing. - Use Case: After the INSS contests a disability benefit claim arguing lack of prior administrative request and citing a STJ theme, use this Skill to produce a replica that refutes the preliminary, distinguishes the precedent, and maintains all original requests. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to draft a replica responding to the INSS contestacao in the current case file, refuting each preliminary and merit argument.
