RedTeam

Attacks plans and ideas with parallel expert critics and returns severity-ranked rebuttals.

Updated Sep 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ruban-s/DevOS --skill redteam-ruban-s
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: RedTeam
Source: https://github.com/ruban-s/DevOS/tree/main/skills/RedTeam
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ruban-s/DevOS --skill redteam-ruban-s

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Committed plans feel solid from the inside, so teams stop asking the awkward questions and hidden flaws ship. This Skill stress-tests any idea, plan, or strategy by sending dozens of parallel expert critics after it before the cost of being wrong becomes real. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Parallel Critic Wave: Decomposes a position into small assertions and attacks each one from 32 personas across builders, system designers, security minds, and outside observers. - Steelman Plus Rebuttal Output: Returns the fairest 8-beat statement of the case alongside the hardest honest 8-beat rebuttal, ordered by severity with repair directions. - Adversarial Validation: Lets rival draft proposals compete under a harsh judge, then fuses the survivors into one stronger recommendation. - Use Case: Before committing to a microservices migration, run the parallel analysis to surface the single load-bearing assumption that could sink the plan, then fix it while changes are still cheap. ## Quick Start Red team this migration plan and give me the strongest objections ranked by severity.

Frequently Asked Questions about RedTeam

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I red team a plan or idea with AI?▼

Provide the plan or position and ask for a red team review. The skill splits it into small assertions, sends parallel critic personas against each one, and returns a steelmanned statement plus a severity-ranked rebuttal with repair directions.

What is the difference between ParallelAnalysis and AdversarialValidation?▼

ParallelAnalysis attacks an existing position with 32 parallel critics to find its weakest joints. AdversarialValidation pits 2-3 rival draft proposals against each other under a harsh judge, then fuses the survivors into one stronger recommendation.

When should I use adversarial review instead of a normal critique?▼

Use it when the cost of being wrong dwarfs the cost of deliberation, such as architecture forks, pricing changes, or launch decisions. Skip it for obvious calls, time-critical work, or questions the field has already settled.

Can this skill test my infrastructure or network security?▼

No. It reviews reasoning, plans, and arguments only. It does not probe hosts, exploit systems, or perform any technical penetration testing against infrastructure.

What output format does a red team review produce?▼

It produces two 8-beat narratives: the fairest statement of the position and the hardest honest rebuttal, each beat held to 12-16 words and ordered by damage potential. Every weakness ships with a repair direction.