redteam-mindset

Enforces persistent testing discipline and scope decisions for authorized red-team engagements.

Updated May 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hhjkjkjk/Claude-skills --skill redteam-mindset-hhjkjkjk
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: redteam-mindset
Source: https://github.com/hhjkjkjk/Claude-skills/tree/main/skills/redteam-mindset
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hhjkjkjk/Claude-skills --skill redteam-mindset-hhjkjkjk

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Red-team operators often self-throttle during authorized engagements: retracting valid findings after one failed recheck, stopping at the first WAF block, or skipping sister applications that share a vulnerable code template. This Skill corrects those conservative defaults so the engagement actually matches its authorized scope. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Mindset Corrections: Nine concrete corrections covering blocker handling, sister-app sweeps, WAPT-vs-red-team scope discipline, aggressive defaults, persistence through captchas/WAFs/rate limits, and multi-technique cross-validation of findings. - Engagement Checklists: Pre-engagement, during-engagement, and post-engagement checklists plus a per-host sweep cadence (path probing, robots.txt parsing, JS secret grep, API endpoint testing, APK decompilation). - Stop-Condition Discipline: Explicit lists of legitimate versus illegitimate stop conditions, with real failure cases where findings were missed or wrongly retracted. - Use Case: At the start of an authorized external red-team engagement, load this Skill so that when a SQL injection recheck fails mid-test, you investigate the defensive change as a new finding instead of retracting the original one. ## Quick Start Load the redteam-mindset skill at the start of my authorized red-team engagement and apply its discipline rules throughout testing.

Frequently Asked Questions about redteam-mindset

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I avoid stopping too early in a red team engagement?▼

Apply the per-host sweep cadence: probe top paths, read robots.txt and sitemap entries, grep JS bundles for secrets, and run every relevant test class per endpoint. Only stop when all in-scope assets are actively probed and every blocker has been tried via at least two alternative vectors.

What is the difference between red team scope and WAPT scope?▼

Red team scope targets access-yielding bugs like SQL injection, RCE, SSRF, and authentication bypass. WAPT scope covers IDOR, CSRF, reflected XSS, and missing security headers. The Skill provides a decision rule: if full exploitation yields no session, foothold, or data exfiltration, deprioritize it.

Should I retract a finding when the recheck fails?▼

No. Preserve original PoC artifacts first, then diff the response to identify what defense was deployed. A mid-engagement mitigation is itself a positive operational finding about the client's incident response, and the original evidence remains valid.

How do I bypass captchas and WAFs during authorized testing?▼

Follow the decision tree: omit or reuse the captcha field, try OCR with preprocessing, then a paid solving service. For WAFs, slow the pace, encode payloads, switch injection contexts or content types, and probe the origin server directly.

When is this skill not appropriate to use?▼

Do not use it for bug bounty programs, WAPT or PCI-style assessments, or pure compliance audits, since those have different scope rules. It is designed specifically for authorized red-team and adversary-emulation engagements.