rebuttal

Parse external reviews into an issue board and draft venue-compliant rebuttals.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM --skill rebuttal-wenwen555
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rebuttal
Source: https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM/tree/main/skills/rebuttal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wenwen555/ARIS-LVLM --skill rebuttal-wenwen555

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers manage external reviews by parsing, organizing, and drafting safe, venue-compliant rebuttals across multiple rounds, reducing manual back-and-forth and ensuring coverage of reviewer concerns.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parse and normalize reviewer comments into an issue board for clear tracking.
  • Generate a strategy plan and allocate response effort across reviewers and rounds.
  • Draft initial rebuttal text that adheres to venue limits and safety constraints, with grounded evidence where possible.
  • Manage follow-up rounds, resubmissions, and risk mitigation without fabricating evidence.
  • Use case: facing multiple reviewers at a conference with strict character limits, produce a compliant opener and a plan for future rounds.

Quick Start

Provide the paper, raw reviews, and venue rules to generate the initial rebuttal draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about rebuttal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a peer-review rebuttal for multiple reviewers with strict venue limits?▼

To write a peer-review rebuttal, provide your paper, raw reviews, and venue rules. The system parses comments into an issue board, allocates response efforts, and generates a venue-compliant draft with safe language and evidence-backed responses.

What is an issue board for academic rebuttal planning and how does it work?▼

An issue board for academic rebuttal planning normalizes parsed reviewer comments into clear tracking items. It organizes concerns by reviewer and round, enabling targeted strategy planning and evidence-grounded responses across multi-round peer-review workflows.

Can I use automated rebuttal drafting for OpenReview multi-round review workflows?▼

Yes, automated rebuttal drafting supports OpenReview multi-round workflows. It manages follow-up rounds, resubmissions, and risk mitigation by enforcing provenance, commitment, and coverage gates while generating venue-compliant drafts.

How do I ensure my academic rebuttal does not fabricate evidence when responding to reviewer concerns?▼

To ensure your academic rebuttal does not fabricate evidence, use a drafting system with provenance and grounding gates. It generates safe language and evidence-backed responses, mitigating risk without inventing unsupported claims during peer-review.

What is the best way to manage response effort allocation across multiple academic reviewers?▼

The best way to manage response effort allocation across academic reviewers is generating a strategy plan after parsing comments into an issue board. This approach distributes effort across reviewers and rounds to maintain venue compliance and coverage.

When do I need venue-compliant drafting for academic writing resubmissions?▼

You need venue-compliant drafting for academic writing resubmissions when facing multi-round peer-review workflows with strict character limits. It enforces coverage gates and safe language to manage reviewer concerns across follow-up rounds.