rebuttal-letter-strategist

Provide the reviewer criticism and the revision you made to the script, which classifies the comment as minor, moderate, major, or harsh and drafts a tone-matched response. Harsh comments receive a professional de-escalation strategy that redirects the discussion constructively.

It scans the criticism text for harsh keywords such as fundamentally, seriously, severely, major, critical, and flawed. Two or more matches classify it as harsh, one match or the word significant as major, unclear or should as moderate, and everything else as minor.

The script requires two command-line arguments: --criticism with the reviewer's comment text and --revision describing how you addressed it. Both are mandatory, and no additional Python packages beyond the standard library are needed.

No, it drafts individual response snippets with suggested tone and strategy for each criticism. You still need to assemble the full point-by-point letter, verify the wording fits your context, and replace placeholder actions with your actual revisions.

Avoid relying on it when the criticism involves complex technical disputes requiring detailed evidence, or when inputs are incomplete. The skill stops and asks for missing required inputs rather than fabricating responses or citations.