rcode-git-flow

Coordinate Git branching and commit workflows for rcode projects.

2|1|Updated Apr 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hanzlahabib/rcode --skill rcode-git-flow
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rcode-git-flow
Source: https://github.com/hanzlahabib/rcode/tree/main/rcode/skills/actions/4-implementation/rcode-git-flow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hanzlahabib/rcode --skill rcode-git-flow

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill removes the guesswork from Git-based collaboration by standardizing how branches, commits, pull requests, and conflict resolution should work in rcode projects.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Branching Strategy: Creates feature, fix, and docs branches from the latest main branch with consistent naming rules.
  • Commit and PR Discipline: Uses Conventional Commits, requires issue-closing footers, and keeps pull request titles and bodies aligned with the tracked work.
  • Conflict Handling: Guides careful merge conflict resolution, testing after merges, and safe follow-up commits without rewriting shared history.
  • Use Case: When a developer starts a new issue, this Skill helps them branch correctly, commit in small steps, open the right PR, and merge without breaking repository policy.

Quick Start

Ask the assistant to prepare a compliant rcode Git workflow for your issue, including the branch name, commit plan, pull request text, and merge-safe next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about rcode-git-flow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize Git branching and commit workflows for feature development?▼

Standardize Git branching and commit workflows by enforcing consistent branch naming from the latest main branch, applying Conventional Commits, and linking pull request closures to tracked issues within an Epic→Feature→Task hierarchy.

What is the best way to resolve merge conflicts without rewriting shared Git history?▼

Resolve merge conflicts safely by carefully handling conflict markers, running tests immediately after merging, and creating follow-up commits to preserve shared repository history without force pushes or rewrites.

How do Conventional Commits improve pull request discipline in version control?▼

Conventional Commits improve pull request discipline by enforcing standardized commit messages and requiring issue-closing footers, keeping PR titles and bodies strictly aligned with the tracked feature or bug fix work.

Does this Git workflow approach require a specific project hierarchy for bug fixes and docs?▼

Yes, this Git workflow operates within an Epic→Feature→Task hierarchy, applying standardized branching, commit rules, and PR guardrails specifically to feature development, bug fixes, and documentation changes.

Why do I need push-approval guardrails for feature branches?▼

Push-approval guardrails protect repository integrity by preventing unauthorized pushes to shared branches, ensuring that merge conflicts are resolved, tests pass, and pull requests meet closure policy before integration.