ralplan

Consensus-driven implementation planning generates candidate approaches, evaluates them independently using a panel of architects, and synthesizes a ranked consensus ADR. It adapts to project risk by scaling panel width and attack depth based on the identified risk level.

To create a consensus-approved implementation plan, invoke the planning skill with your project description. The system dispatches parallel evaluation tasks and adversarial attacks to vet approaches before synthesizing a final consensus decision.

Adversarial evaluation is needed for implementation planning when managing high-risk projects that require multiple perspectives. It dispatches critics to attack candidate approaches, ensuring well-rounded vetting and reducing blind spots in the final decision.

Yes, this risk assessment approach operates without external dependencies. It coordinates parallel tasks internally, using a dispatched panel of architects and critics to evaluate candidate approaches and generate a ranked consensus ADR.

A limitation of parallel evaluation for project planning is the coordination overhead required to dispatch and synthesize multiple architect and critic perspectives. It is specifically designed for high-risk projects, making it potentially excessive for simpler, low-risk tasks.