ralplan

Coordinate multi-agent consensus planning to gate vague execution requests before coding.

Updated Mar 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ClementATH/oh-my-claudecode --skill ralplan-clementath
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ralplan
Source: https://github.com/ClementATH/oh-my-claudecode/tree/main/skills/ralplan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ClementATH/oh-my-claudecode --skill ralplan-clementath

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Ralplan intercepts vague or underspecified execution requests and routes them through a structured consensus planning cycle (Planner, Architect, Critic) to produce a clear, testable plan before any implementation begins.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Consensus-driven planning loop that gates execution with explicit scope, drivers, and options.
  • Supports interactive and deliberate modes for risk management and user involvement.
  • Re-review loops with up to five iterations to ensure quality and alignment across stakeholders.

Quick Start

Use the ralplan command with a task description to initiate consensus planning before execution.

Frequently Asked Questions about ralplan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I gate coding execution with multi-agent consensus planning?▼

You can gate coding execution by routing vague requests through a structured Planner, Architect, and Critic loop that produces a testable plan before implementation begins. This consensus-driven cycle ensures explicit scope and risk assessment before any coding work starts.

When do I need architecture review and risk assessment before starting implementation?▼

Architecture review and risk assessment are needed before implementation when handling high-risk or ambiguous execution requests. A multi-stage consensus planning loop ensures stakeholder alignment and prevents underspecified coding work from proceeding.

What is the best way to handle vague or underspecified execution requests in an automated workflow?▼

The best way to handle vague execution requests is intercepting them with a structured consensus planning cycle before implementation. Routing underspecified tasks through risk assessment and test planning generates clear, actionable options for stakeholders.

Can I use interactive and deliberate modes for risk management during task planning?▼

Yes, interactive and deliberate modes are supported for risk management and user involvement during task planning. These modes enable stakeholder participation in the consensus loop, which supports re-review iterations up to five times for quality alignment.

How many re-review iterations are supported in a consensus-driven planning loop?▼

The consensus-driven planning loop supports re-review loops with up to five iterations to ensure quality and alignment across stakeholders. This multi-stage cycle involving the Planner, Architect, and Critic progressively refines vague requests into testable plans.

Does multi-agent task planning work for high-risk or ambiguous requests across teams?▼

Multi-agent task planning works across teams for high-risk or ambiguous requests by applying architecture review, risk assessment, and test planning before implementation. The consensus loop gates execution to ensure all stakeholder requirements are explicitly met.