quality-of-information-check

Audits the evidence base behind an assessment's key judgments using the CIA Quality of Information Check.

4|1|Updated Jul 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill quality-of-information-check-radarist
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-of-information-check
Source: https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills/tree/main/skills/quality-of-information-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/radarist/structured-analytic-skills --skill quality-of-information-check-radarist

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Assessments often rest on thin, single-source, or re-reported evidence whose weaknesses are forgotten by the time the product ships. This Skill audits the entire source base behind an assessment's key judgments, exposes which conclusions rest on one origin, and tempers stated confidence accordingly. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Source-to-judgment matrix: Maps every source to every key judgment, collapses re-reporting chains, and counts only independent supports. - Five-status judgment flags: Labels each judgment corroborated, thin, single-source, conflicting, or unsupported, with per-judgment gap and deception analysis. - ICD 206 source summary statement: Produces the standards-compliant statement covering strengths, key sources, corroboration, and expertise, plus a confidence revision per judgment. - Use Case: Before an intelligence brief or market assessment ships, run the check to discover that three of seven citations trace back to one press release, and lower the confidence on the affected judgments. ## Quick Start Use the quality-of-information-check skill to audit the sourcing behind the key judgments in the attached draft assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-of-information-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit the sourcing behind an assessment's key judgments?▼

List the key judgments with their stated confidence, inventory every source with origin, access, motive and an Admiralty grade, then build a source-to-judgment matrix. Collapse re-reporting chains before counting independent supports, and finish with a source summary statement and revised confidence per judgment.

What is a Quality of Information Check in intelligence analysis?▼

It is a diagnostic technique from the CIA Tradecraft Primer (2009) that evaluates the completeness and soundness of sources behind an analytic line. ODNI ICD 206 later standardized its output as source descriptors and a source summary statement.

How do I tell if multiple citations are actually one source?▼

Trace each 'according to' chain back to its origin and collapse items sharing the same originator, document, or incentive structure. Three outlets repeating one press release count as a single independent source, not corroboration.

When should I use this instead of grading a single source?▼

Use this check when auditing an entire evidence base behind multiple judgments before a product ships. For grading one source's reliability use an Admiralty rating, and for corroborating one claim across independent sources use triangulation.

What must an ICD 206 source summary statement cover?▼

It should cover four elements: strengths and weaknesses of the source base, the sources most important to key judgments, what is meaningfully corroborative or conflicting, and any subject-matter expertise relied on. This Skill treats all four as mandatory output fields.