proof-checker

Verify and repair LaTeX mathematical proofs with audit reports.

Updated May 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM --skill proof-checker-duypham2801
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proof-checker
Source: https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM/tree/main/.claude/skills/proof-checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM --skill proof-checker-duypham2801

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires bash, read, grep, glob, write, edit, agent, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you rigorously verify a mathematical proof, pinpoint gaps (including hypothesis misuse and illegal interchanges), and produce repaired derivations that are re-checked until the proof meets objective acceptance gates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Proof gap detection with an issue taxonomy: Identifies logical, analytic, parameter-scope, and probability-mode failures such as unjustified assertions, quantifier mistakes, missing domination for DCT/Fubini/Leibniz, and uniformity ambiguity.
  • Iterative repair workflow: Proposes fix strategies (add derivations, strengthen assumptions, weaken claims, or add references), re-derives corrected steps, and generates a traceable audit trail.
  • Audit reporting for traceability: Produces an audit document (including obligation accounting) so you can see what was verified, what remains assumed, and what changed.

Quick Start

Use the proof-checker skill to check the LaTeX proof in your main .tex file by asking it to verify the proof and output a full audit report.

Frequently Asked Questions about proof-checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify a mathematical proof in LaTeX for logical gaps?▼

To verify a mathematical proof in LaTeX, the system reads your .tex content, identifies logical gaps through structured cross-model review, and generates a detailed audit report. It checks proof obligations, quantifier scope, and interchange safety.

What types of errors does mathematical proof verification detect?▼

Mathematical proof verification detects logical, analytic, parameter-scope, and probability-mode failures. This includes unjustified assertions, quantifier mistakes, missing domination for DCT/Fubini/Leibniz interchanges, and uniformity ambiguity across theorem and lemma derivations.

Can I automatically fix and re-derive missing steps in a LaTeX proof?▼

Yes, you can automatically fix missing steps in a LaTeX proof. The tool proposes fix strategies like adding derivations or strengthening assumptions, re-derives corrected steps with full mathematical derivations, and re-reviews the proof until it meets objective acceptance gates.

How do I generate an audit report for theorem and lemma proofs in a research paper?▼

You generate an audit report for theorem and lemma proofs by running the verification workflow on your LaTeX research paper. The resulting document provides obligation accounting and a traceable audit trail showing what was verified, what remains assumed, and what changed.

Does proof verification work with probability theory and uniform convergence checks?▼

Yes, proof verification works with probability theory and uniform convergence checks. It specifically validates uniformity ambiguity and probability-mode failures, ensuring missing domination conditions are caught for DCT, Fubini, and Leibniz interchange safety.