What problem does it solve? Most promotion packets fail because evidence is reconstructed from memory at packet time, claims are framed as activities instead of impact, and scope calibration is either inflated or erased by modesty. This Skill structures the entire promotion case — from the year-round evidence file to the self-review narrative — so the packet argues against the next level's actual rubric. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Year-Round Evidence File: A running doc capturing dated, linked, rubric-tagged wins as they happen, fed by a weekly review habit. - Early Gap Analysis: Maps your record against the next level's rubric dimensions (strong / thin / gap) with your manager two quarters out, so gaps are still fillable. - Impact-Framed Narrative: Converts activities into outcome + role + evidence-link claims, calibrated precisely in both directions, woven into an arc committees remember. - Use Case: A senior engineer targeting staff engineer runs a gap analysis six months early, discovers cross-team influence is thin, volunteers to lead a cross-team API effort, and writes the packet in two evenings from the evidence file. ## Quick Start Help me build my promotion packet for the next level by setting up an evidence file and gap-analyzing my record against the rubric.
