predict

A multi-persona spec risk assessment evaluates code or feature specifications for architectural, security, and release risks before implementation. It uses independent personas to generate validated findings, confidence scores, and a voting gate to decide whether to proceed, revise, or rethink.

Run a security review by applying a three-persona evaluation to your repository spec. This generates per-persona verdicts with validated file:line risks, concrete mitigations, and a meta-expert synthesis that classifies blockers versus warnings for pre-merge validation.

Yes, you can automate gatekeeping by applying the risk assessment to deployment plans. It enforces hard rules for mitigation quality and applies a pure voting gate to output a PROCEED, REVISE, or RETHINK decision, producing an auditable TSV log for tasks.

Yes, the risk assessment operates independently without external dependencies. It performs spec review and release readiness checks natively, retrying vague findings and reporting incomplete findings separately to ensure validated file:line accuracy.

The best way to identify architectural risks is using a parallel, independent Technical Architect persona evaluation. It produces structured verdicts, confidence scores, and concrete mitigations synthesized by a meta-expert to deduplicate findings and classify blockers.

The voting gate strictly outputs PROCEED, REVISE, or RETHINK decisions based on hard rules for gating and mitigation quality. It requires validated file:line findings from all personas, meaning vague or incomplete findings are retried or reported separately rather than ignored.