post-referee

Resolves code-review disputes by inspecting cited source files and producing findings reports.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude --skill post-referee
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: post-referee
Source: https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude/tree/main/skills/pst-referee
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/180VRisLife/.claude --skill post-referee

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Neutral arbiter that independently verifies finder and challenger claims, producing final findings report.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent adjudication: Reads each cited file:line and forms a ruling based on the evidence.
  • Structured outputs: Produces per-finding rulings plus a consolidated audit report.
  • Use Case: When two parties dispute a finding in a code base, this skill adjudicates and documents the final findings with evidence.

Quick Start

Load the cited source files, read them with surrounding context, and render a final findings report with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about post-referee

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify disputed code review findings with line-precise citations?▼

To verify disputed code review findings, an independent arbiter reads each cited file and line to inspect the actual source code, forming a ruling based on the evidence with line-precise citations.

What is the process for adjudicating conflicting code audit claims?▼

Adjudicating conflicting code audit claims involves independently verifying evidence from both finder and challenger by reading cited source files, then producing structured per-finding rulings and a consolidated audit summary.

How do I generate a final findings report for disputed codebase evidence?▼

You generate a final findings report by loading the cited source files, reading them with surrounding context, and rendering a structured report that documents each verified finding with evidence.

Can I use independent adjudication for audit scenarios with multiple conflicting parties?▼

Yes, independent adjudication is designed for code-review or audit scenarios where a finder and challenger present conflicting evidence, resolving disputes by inspecting the actual source files.

What are the limitations of using an automated arbiter for source-file inspection?▼

The primary limitation is that the adjudication process strictly requires each cited file and line to be loaded and read, meaning it cannot rule on evidence that lacks precise file:line citations.