policy-redraft

Generate a marked policy redraft that closes a compliance gap.

183|37|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill policy-redraft-zhou210712
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: policy-redraft
Source: https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH/tree/main/regulatory-legal/skills/policy-redraft
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill policy-redraft-zhou210712

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps turn identified regulatory or policy gaps into a minimally edited, review-ready policy redraft that clearly marks what to verify, instead of risking direct changes to already approved policy documents.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gap-to-draft redrafting workflow: Takes a specific GAP (or gap description) plus the current approved policy text and relevant regulation text, then produces a targeted redraft for only the affected sections.
  • Regulation validity checking: Verifies the referenced regulation’s status (e.g., delayed/pending, amended, suspended, revoked) using the same mode as upstream policy-diff outputs.
  • Marked, internal-review deliverables: Produces a new file named with a proposed redraft suffix and embeds [需核实] tags (including review-critical dates/thresholds/requirements) to support safe internal governance.

Use Case: A compliance team finds a mismatch between an internal policy and an applicable regulatory update; this skill generates a proposed redraft memo and a marked policy section patch without closing the gap in the tracker.

Quick Start

Provide a GAP-ID and the current approved policy text plus the regulation text (or the policy-diff extracted regulation), then ask for a redraft using policy-redraft’s workflow guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions about policy-redraft

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft policy revisions to close compliance gaps without altering the approved source document?▼

Policy redrafting generates a marked proposed policy redraft that closes a specific compliance gap without editing the approved source policy. It outputs a new draft file containing pervasive [需核实] tags to support safe internal governance review.

What inputs do I need to generate a marked policy redraft for internal review?▼

Generating a policy redraft requires collecting specific gap details, current approved policy text with version confirmation, and applicable regulation text. These inputs validate regulation status and produce a minimally updated, review-ready draft file.

How does regulation validity checking work during the policy redrafting workflow?▼

Regulation validity checking verifies the referenced regulation's current status, such as delayed, pending, amended, suspended, or revoked. It uses the same mode as upstream policy-diff outputs to ensure the policy redraft relies on currently active regulatory text.

Can I use policy-diff findings to create a targeted policy section patch?▼

Yes, policy-diff findings can be converted into structured regulatory text to produce a targeted redraft for only the affected policy sections. This workflow generates a proposed redraft memo and a marked section patch without closing the original gap in the tracker.

What do the [需核实] tags in the redrafted policy output mean?▼

The [需核实] tags in the redrafted policy output mark review-critical dates, thresholds, and requirements needing verification. They are embedded throughout the new draft file to ensure compliance teams check specific details before approving any policy changes.

When should I avoid direct edits to an approved policy and use a redraft workflow instead?▼

You should use a policy redraft workflow instead of direct edits when a compliance gap is discovered between an internal policy and a regulatory update, and the approved source policy must remain untouched during internal review. This safely proposes changes with marked revisions.