plan-review-expert

Review an implementation plan by systematically checking for completeness, security threats, dependencies, and scalability. This process identifies missing requirements, surfaces technical risks with mitigations, and produces a structured verdict to prevent failed implementations before coding begins.

Validating a technical proposal requires a structured architecture review that checks step ordering, blocking dependencies, and alternative approaches. This method ensures the design is realistically achievable by producing a detailed risk assessment with concrete severities and recommended fixes.

To determine if your feature plan covers security controls, apply a structured threat checklist reviewing spoofing, tampering, authorization, and rate limiting. This validates that critical security measures are explicitly addressed and surfaces any absent controls before implementation.

Assess technical risks in a design document by analyzing dependency chains, verifying step ordering, and evaluating maintainability issues. This risk identification process outputs structured risk items with concrete severities and actionable mitigations to reduce architectural vulnerabilities.

You need a structured plan review when validating the completeness, error handling, and scalability of a technical proposal or feature plan before implementation. This process detects missing edge cases and uncovered critical steps, ensuring the plan is safe and realistically achievable.