plan

Generate executable planning workflows with interview, direct, and consensus modes.

1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill plan-linnanli
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan
Source: https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw/tree/main/.codex/skills/plan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Linnanli/xClaw --skill plan-linnanli

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Plan provides structured, multi-mode planning workflows to turn vague goals into executable roadmaps, balancing discovery through interviews with direct planning and iterative refinement via a consensus loop.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode selection: Interview, Direct, Consensus, and Review to match the task context.
  • Automated exploration: integrates lightweight codebase facts gathering before interviews to ground discussions.
  • Multi-role review: Planner -> Architect -> Critic loop (RALPLAN-DR) for high-stakes planning with risk-aware validation.
  • Drafting plans: produces concrete implementation steps, acceptance criteria, and ADR/follow-ups for traceability.
  • Review mode: allows independent critique and quality assurance without regenerating the plan.

Quick Start

Describe your goal and constraints to have Plan generate a structured, executable work plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn vague project goals into executable planning workflows with clear acceptance criteria?▼

Executable planning workflows transform vague goals into structured roadmaps by balancing interview-based requirements discovery with direct planning and iterative consensus refinement to produce clear acceptance criteria.

What is the best way to gather requirements for complex tasks across multiple stakeholders?▼

Requirements discovery for complex tasks across multiple stakeholders is best handled through interview-based exploration, grounded by lightweight codebase facts gathering to anchor discussions and ensure traceable execution plans.

How does multi-role review work for high-stakes project planning and risk-aware decision making?▼

Multi-role review applies a Planner, Architect, and Critic loop to validate high-stakes planning through risk-aware decision making, ensuring independent critique and quality assurance before finalizing implementation steps.

When do I need consensus-based refinement instead of direct planning for project requirements?▼

Consensus-based refinement is needed when project requirements demand iterative alignment across stakeholders, whereas direct planning suits tasks with predefined constraints and immediate execution needs.

Can I review and critique a generated plan independently without regenerating the entire workflow?▼

Yes, Review mode allows you to critique a generated plan independently for quality assurance without regenerating the entire planning workflow or modifying the existing implementation steps.

What are the limitations of automated codebase exploration during requirements discovery?▼

Automated codebase exploration during requirements discovery serves only as a lightweight facts gathering mechanism to ground interviews, requiring subsequent stakeholder validation to mitigate planning risks.