plan-deliberator

Resolving cross-subsystem constraints in an implementation plan requires structured multi-agent deliberation to negotiate trade-offs across affected codebase areas. Delegates independently investigate specifications and delivery constraints, then converge through bounded, evidence-grounded dialogue rounds.

Multi-agent deliberation for software architecture planning is needed when a plan spans multiple subsystems and leaves migration strategy or execution sequencing unresolved. It negotiates concrete revisions for undecided trade-offs by applying disjoint territory assignments across affected codebase areas.

Validating a migration strategy across multiple codebase territories requires assigning delegates to independently examine affected areas and delivery constraints. Sequential bounded dialogue relays evidence-grounded proposals until consensus tracking records a versioned, auditable deliberation artifact.

Structured deliberation can revise an implementation plan before adversarial validation by convening an evidence-grounded delegate panel. It requires disjoint territory assignments and consensus tracking to record proposal versions, accepted amendments, trade-offs, and evidence in a persisted deliberation record.

Limitations of structured deliberation for delivery planning include the requirement for disjoint territory assignments and sequential bounded dialogue rounds. It cannot validate plans itself; it must negotiate revisions and converge complex plans before a separate adversarial validation step.

Plan-deliberator tracks consensus and disputes during implementation planning by recording proposal versions, accepted amendments, trade-offs, and evidence citations. This creates an auditable deliberation artifact that persists the decision record across bounded dialogue rounds.