plan-ceo-review

Reviews implementation plans with scope-mode selection, failure-mode mapping, and structured issue resolution.

Updated Jan 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/psyche911/AntigravityTest --skill plan-ceo-review-psyche911
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/psyche911/AntigravityTest/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/psyche911/AntigravityTest --skill plan-ceo-review-psyche911

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Engineering plans often ship with silent failure modes, unhandled edge cases, missing observability, and unchallenged scope assumptions. This Skill performs a rigorous, CEO-level review of any implementation plan before code is written, catching landmines early and forcing explicit decisions on scope, errors, security, testing, and deployment. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Three Review Modes: Choose SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big, find the 10-star product), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor on the agreed plan), or SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to the minimum viable version), with committed execution of the selected mode. - Ten-Section Review Pipeline: Covers architecture, error/rescue mapping, security threat modeling, data flow and interaction edge cases, code quality, tests, performance, observability, deployment/rollback, and long-term trajectory. - Mandatory Registries and Diagrams: Produces an error & rescue registry, failure modes registry, ASCII diagrams for architecture, data flows, state machines, and rollback flows, plus TODOS.md proposals and a completion summary. - Use Case: Before implementing a new feature touching multiple services, run this review to map every exception class, flag unrescued errors as critical gaps, and resolve each issue through structured one-at-a-time decision prompts. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to run a CEO-mode plan review on your implementation plan and select a scope mode when prompted.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an implementation plan before writing code?▼

Run this plan review workflow, which audits the current system state, challenges the plan's premises, and walks through ten sections covering architecture, errors, security, tests, and deployment. Each issue is resolved through a structured decision prompt with a recommendation.

What are the scope expansion, hold, and reduction modes?▼

Scope expansion pushes the plan toward a more ambitious 10x version, hold scope accepts the plan and makes it bulletproof, and scope reduction cuts everything except the minimum viable outcome. Once a mode is selected, the review commits to it without drifting.

How does the error and rescue mapping work?▼

Every new method or codepath that can fail is listed with its specific exception classes, whether each is rescued, the rescue action, and what the user sees. Unrescued errors that fail silently are flagged as critical gaps requiring fixes.

Does this review make code changes to my project?▼

No, the review explicitly does not modify code or start implementation. It only analyzes the plan, runs read-only system audit commands like git log and grep, and produces findings, diagrams, and TODOS.md proposals.

When should I not use this plan review process?▼

It is heavyweight for trivial changes like typo fixes or one-line config updates. The full ten-section review with mandatory diagrams and registries is designed for non-trivial plans where failure modes, edge cases, and rollout risk matter.